United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2021

Gonzalez v. Chao

Gonzalez v. Chao
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided January 21, 2021
Gonzalez v. Chao

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANGELICA GRACIA GONZALEZ, Case No.: 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary Department EFFECT SERVICE; AND of Transportation, Defendant. (2) SETTING STATUS HEARING 17 [ECF No. 9] 18 On January 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed nunc pro tunc a response letter to this Court’s Order to Show Cause. ECF No. 9. The response letter expressed Plaintiff’s difficulties in effecting service. See id. 21 Construing the pro se Plaintiff’s response liberally, see Bernhardt v. Los Angeles Cty., 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003), the Court constructs Plaintiff’s plea as needing assistance from the U.S. Marshal to effect service. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (discussing the service process for proceedings in forma pauperis). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for U.S. Marshal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3).

1 Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to re-issue a summons as || to Plaintiff’s Complaint upon Defendant, and provide Plaintiff with the “IFP Package,” || consisting of the following: 4 1. The re-issued Summons; 5 2. A certified copy of this Order; 6 3. A certified copy of the Court’s Order granting Plaintiff's motion to proceed 7 in forma pauperis, ECF No. 5; 8 4. A certified copy of the Complaint; and 9 5. A blank U.S. Marshal Form 285.

10 Plaintiff shall complete the U.S. Marshal Form 285, and forward the Form 285 || along with the rest of the IFP Package to the U.S. Marshal. The Court reminds Plaintiff || that plaintiffs must comply with the special requirements outlined in Federal Rule of || Civil Procedure 4(i) for serving the United States and its agencies, officers, or employees.

14 Upon receipt of the IFP Package, the U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve a copy || of the Complaint and re-issued Summons upon the Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on 16 complete U.S. Marshal Form 285. All costs of service will be advanced by the || United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). In addition, for good ||cause appearing, the Court EXTENDS the time for effecting service for 45 days, || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic status hearing be set on March 21 2021 at 1:00 PM for briefing on Plaintiffs prosecution of the case.

22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 ||Dated: January 21, 2021 25 Hon. athe Coke 26 United States District Judge 28 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.