United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2021

Blackmer v. Six Named Agents of the U.S. Department of Justice

Blackmer v. Six Named Agents of the U.S. Department of Justice
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided April 5, 2021
Blackmer v. Six Named Agents of the U.S. Department of Justice

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL BLACKMER, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00566-MMA-LL No. 71470, ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR SIX NAMED AGENTS OF THE U.S. FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED DEP’T OF JUSTICE, IN FORMA PAUPERIS 17 Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 23 Plaintiff Paul Blackmer, currently incarcerated at New Hampshire State Prison for Men located in Concord, New Hampshire, is proceeding pro se in this civil action. See Doc. No. 1.

26 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) Status 27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

10 To date, Plaintiff has not paid the initial filing fee or filed a Motion to Proceed IFP.

11 Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 12 1051.

13 II. Conclusion and Order 14 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 15 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and Section 1915(a); and 18 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3.2(b).

23 // // In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52.

27 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020)). The additional $52 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff || with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to || Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will ||remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy the fee || requirements of 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and without further Order of the Court.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 || DATE: April 5, 2021 Wha f □□ □□ □□ 9 HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO 10 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.