G.C. v. San Diego Unified School District

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA G.C., an individual, Case No.: 3:21-cv-19-L-BGS 12 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION TO APPOINT A SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL GUARDIAN AD LITEM [DOC. NO. DISTRICT, 9] 16 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint Linda Clark as guardian ad litem. (Doc. No. 9).

The evidence submitted with the petition indicates Plaintiff lacks the capacity to understand the nature or consequence of the lawsuit. And it shows he is unable to assist counsel in preparation of the case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c) therefore applies to Plaintiff. Linda Clark - Plaintiff’s mother - is willing and able to serve as guardian ad litem. For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the petition to appoint Linda Clark as guardian ad litem for the purposes of this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c); Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011); Davis v. Walker, 745 F.3d 26 1303, 1310 (9th Cir. 2014).

1 In support of the petition, Plaintiff submitted medical and educational records.

2 || After a review of the material, the Court finds there are compelling reasons to seal the ||exhibits. Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978); Pintos v. Pac. || Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard on sealing || judicial records); Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). The petition itself also contains several excerpts from the exhibits.

7 The Court therefore sua sponte DIRECTS the Clerk to file under seal Doc. No. 9 || including 9-1, 9-2, 9-3, and 9-4).

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 Dated: April 1, 2021 fee fp 12 H . James Lorenz, 3 United States District Judge