United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2021

Heck v. Saul

Heck v. Saul
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided April 15, 2021
Heck v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE ANN H., Case No.: 20cv1122-MDD Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT v. MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO Social Security,

THE EQUAL ACCESS TO Defendant. JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 16 U.S.C. § 1920

[ECF No. 21]

On June 19, 2020, Plaintiff Lee Ann H. filed this Social Security appeal challenging the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. (ECF No. 1). On March 4, 2021, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion for voluntary remand, pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC § 405(g), and judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. (ECF Nos. 19-20). The parties now stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney’s fees and expenses in the U.S.C. § 2412(d). (ECF No. 21 at 1).

A prevailing party may seek attorney’s fees from the United States under the EAJA within thirty days of final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). “A sentence four remand becomes a final judgment, for purposes of attorneys’ fees claims brought pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon expiration of the time for appeal.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002). If one of the parties is the United States, either party may g || file a notice of appeal within sixty days of the order appealed from. See Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(B). “A plaintiff who obtains a sentence four remand is considered a prevailing party for purposes of attorneys’ fees.” Akopyan, 296 F.8d at 854. Therefore, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action for purposes of attorney’s fees, the parties’ joint motion is timely, and the Court finds the stipulated amount of fees and expenses to be reasonable.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and AWARDS Plaintiff attorney’s fees and expenses in the total amount of $2,500.00. Fees will be made payable to Lee Ann H., but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Lee Ann H. does not owe a federal debt, then the government will cause the payment of fees, expenses, and costs to be made directly to the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by || Lee Ann H. Any payments shall be delivered to Brian C. Shapiro.

91 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2021 + uk | [ Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.