Clover v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JASON CLOVER, et al. Case No.: 20cv567-LAB (WVG) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 13 v. JOINT MOTION TO STAY 14 CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO HOUSING LLC, et al.

Defendants.

18 On March 12, the Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that, among other things, they were not entitled to immunity. The Court did not resolve the question of whether the immunity they asserted was jurisdictional. They filed a notice of appeal of that order, and the Ninth Circuit has set a briefing schedule.

22 The parties have now filed a joint motion to stay the case, pending the outcome of Childs v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC (9th Circuit Case No. 20-56049), the outcome of which will likely be controlling in this case.

25 A valid notice of appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction over all but tangential matters. Marks v. Clarke, 102 F.3d 1012, 1017 n.8 (9th Cir. 1996). The denial of immunity is immediately appealable. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 529–30 (1985). Plaintiffs’ joinder in the motion makes clear that they do not believe ||the Court should certify it as frivolous and continue adjudicating the claims. See || Marks, 102 F.3d at 1017 n.8 (holding that district court is not divested of jurisdiction ||where it certifies that interlocutory appeal is frivolous or forfeited). Because the ||issue of immunity is central to the case, and because immunity could deprive the Court of jurisdiction, the matters appealed pertain to the entire case. The Court ||therefore finds that the interlocutory appeal has divested it of jurisdiction to || proceed, and that no stay is necessary.

8 The joint motion to stay pending resolution of the appeal is DENIED AS || MOOT.

11 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 ||Dated: April 19, 2021 13 / wit 4. WY 14 Honorable Larry Alan Burns 45 United States District Judge