1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Raymundo Jude COLON, Case No.: 21-cv-01293-BGS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, 15 [ECF No. 6] Defendant. 16

17

18 On July 19, 2021, Plaintiff Raymundo Jude Colon filed a complaint against the 19 Commissioner of Social Security, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s final 20 decision denying Plaintiff’s application for Social Security Disability Insurance and/or 21 Supplemental Security Income. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff consented to the disposition of the 22 case by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal pursuant to

(c). (ECF No. 23 5.) Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma 24 Pauperis (“IFP Motion”). (ECF No. 6.) 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. 28

(a); see

(a) (requiring a party instituting a civil action to 28 1 pay a filing fee of $350 as well as a $50 administrative fee). An action may proceed despite 2 a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP 3 pursuant to

(a), which states: 4 [A]ny court of the United States may authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding . . . without 5 prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit 6 that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 7

(a)(1). The determination of indigency falls within the district 8 court’s discretion. California Men’s Colony v. Rowland,

(9th Cir. 1991), 9 reversed on other grounds by,

(1993) (“Section 1915 typically requires the 10 reviewing court to exercise its sound discretion in determining whether the affiant has 11 satisfied the statute’s requirement of indigency.”). 12 A party need not “be absolutely destitute” to proceed IFP. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de 13 Nemours & Co.,

(1948). “Nonetheless, a plaintiff seeking IFP status 14 must allege poverty ‘with some particularity, definiteness, and certainty.’” Escobedo v. 15 Applebees,

(9th Cir. 2015) (citing United States v. McQuade, 647 16 f.3D 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient 17 where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessitates 18 of life.”

“But, the same even-handed care must be employed to assure that federal 19 funds are not squandered to underwrite, at public expense, either frivolous claims or the 20 remonstrances of a suitor who is financially able, in whole or in part, to pull his own oar.” 21 Temple v. Ellerthorp,

(D. R.I.) 22 Based on the information provided in the application (ECF No. 6), the Court finds 23 that Plaintiff is unable to pay the required filing fee. See, e.g., Jefferson, 277 F.2d at 725 24 (“One need not be absolutely destitute to obtain [the] benefits of the in forma pauperis 25 statute.”); Escobedo v. Applebees,

(9th Cir. 2015) (noting “there is no 26 formula set forth by statute, regulation, or case law to determine when someone is poor 27 enough to earn IFP status,” but, “[w]hatever the standard, $350 is a lot of money to many 28 1 || millions of Americans”). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed 2 || IFP (ECF No. 6) and ORDERS as follows: 3 1. The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint filed on July 4 || 19, 2021 and an accompanying summons upon Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on U.S. 5 || Marshal Form 285. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. 6 2. Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendant, or, if appearance has been entered by 7 ||counsel, upon Defendant’s counsel, a copy of every further pleading or document 8 ||submitted for consideration of the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to 9 || be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the manner in which a true and correct 10 ||copy of any document was served on Defendant or Defendant’s counsel and the date of 11 service. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 ||Dated: August 20, 2021 p / / on. Bernard G. Skomal 15 United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28