Davis v. Saul
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 20CV814-BLM
TONIA SUZETTE DAVIS,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF v. ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) SECURITY,
Defendant. [ECF No. 24]
On April 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, seeking judicial review of the denial of her applications for “disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.” ECF No. 1.
On June 7, 2021, the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Remanding for Further Proceedings. ECF No. 23.
On August 12, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Motion for the Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. ECF No. 24. The parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $4,700.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). Id. thirty days of final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). “A sentence four remand becomes a final judgment, for purposes of attorneys’ fees claims brought pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 3 ||2412(d), upon expiration of the time for appeal.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002). If one of the parties is the United States, either party may file a notice of appeal within sixty days of the order appealed from. See Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(B). “A plaintiff who obtains a sentence four remand is considered a prevailing party for attorneys’ fees.” Akopyan, 296 F.3d at 854. Therefore, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action for purposes of attorney's fees, the parties’ joint motion is timely, and the Court finds the stipulated amount of fees and expenses reasonable.
Having considered the joint motion and finding the stipulated amount of fees and expenses reasonable, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and AWARDS Plaintiff attorney’s and expenses in the total amount of $4,700.00, subject to the terms of the parties’ joint motion [see ECF No. 24]. Fees will be made payable to Tonia Suzette Davis, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Tonia Suzette Davis does not owe a federal debt, the government will cause the payment of fees, expenses, and costs to be made directly to the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Tonia Suzette Davis. Any payments will be delivered to Steven G. Rosales.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/17/2021 lobe Mager
Hon. Barbara L. Major United States Maqistrate Judde
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.