United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2021

Schatz v. Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC

Schatz v. Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided October 26, 2021
Schatz v. Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SCHATZ, an individual, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00513-H-LL Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND

RETAINING JURISDICTION

FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF

HENDERSON, LLC, a Nevada limited [Doc. No. 71.] liability company; and DOES 1 through

50, inclusive,

Defendants.

On September 16, 2021, Plaintiff David Schatz and Defendant Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC (collectively, the “Parties”) filed a notice of settlement. (Doc. No. 68.)

On October 20, 2021, the Parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and requested that this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. (Doc. No. 71.) For good cause shown, the Court grants the Parties’ joint motion and dismisses this case with prejudice. The Court exercises its discretion to retain jurisdiction in this matter to resolve any disputes between the Parties with respect to the enforcement of the settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994); K.C. ex rel. Erica C. v. Torlakson, 762 F.3d 963, 967 (9th Cir. 2014).

The Parties did not address the allocation of costs in their motion or stipulation. Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs unless the settlement agreement provides otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 26, 2021 | | | ul | | | MARILYN ®. HUFF. Distri ge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.