United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2021

McKinney v. Central Intellegence Agency

McKinney v. Central Intellegence Agency
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided November 10, 2021
McKinney v. Central Intellegence Agency

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 21-CV-1893-CAB-AGS JONATHAN WILLIAM MCKINNEY,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, [Doc. No. 2]

Defendant.

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Doc. No. 2.] Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in the district court must pay a filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5(a). However, the Court may authorize a party to proceed without paying the fee if that party submits an affidavit demonstrating an inability to pay. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). “Nonetheless, a plaintiff seeking IFP status must allege poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).

According to his application, Plaintiff has a monthly income of $4,000, with monthly expenses of $3,750, and over $2,000 in a checking account. Based on the information provided, the court is not persuaded that Plaintiff lacks the ability to pay the filing fee and “still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo, 787 F.3d at 1234.

For all the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's application to proceed IFP is DENIED. Plaintiff is also advised that the proper venue for this case appears to be the Central District of California, where Plaintiff resides, and not this district, which does not appear to have connection to Plaintiffs claim. Absent additional allegations establishing proper venue in this district, the Court will transfer this case to the Central District if Plaintiff pays filing fee here. Alternatively, Plaintiff may simply re-file his complaint in the Central District and pay the filing fee there. If Plaintiff chooses to pay the filing fee in this district, he must do so no later than December 3, 2021. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee by the deadline, the Clerk shall close the case without further order from the Court.

Itis SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2021 €

Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.