Marcus Allen Holmes v. Joshua Sauno
Marcus Allen Holmes v. Joshua Sauno
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-11082-SVW-SK Document 71 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:217 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:20-cv-11082-SVW (SK) Date: March 1, 2022 Title Marcus Allen Holmes v. Joshua Sauno
Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge
Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
For the reason checked below, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause on or before March 31, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). x Defendant Sauno did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default on the attached form and filing a motion for default judgment, or by dismissing the complaint using the attached notice of voluntary dismissal. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff’s response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (03/15) Civil Minutes – General Page 1 of 1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown