Michael J. Libman v. United States of America
Michael J. Libman v. United States of America
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:21-cv-09455-FMO-MAA Document 116 Filed 04/05/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:2192 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 21-9455 FMO (MAAx) Date April 5, 2022 Title Michael J. Libman, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorney Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Proofs of Service Having reviewed plaintiffs’ proofs of service with respect to defendants Andrew Civetti (“Civetti”), Jim Doe, John Doe, Nicola Hannah (“Hannah”), Mack Eric Jenkins (“Jenkins”), Julienne Mayfield (“Mayfield”), Melissa J. Mills (“Mills”), and Thomas Ruscitti (“Ruscitti”), and waiver of service with respect to Mills, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs’ proofs of service filed with respect to Civetti (Document Nos. 55 and 82), Mayfield (Document Nos. 56 and 82), John Doe (Document Nos. 57 and 82), Ruscitti (Document Nos. 58 and 82), Jim Doe (Document Nos. 59 and 82), Jenkins (Document Nos. 60 and 80), Hannah (Document Nos. 61 and 81), and Mills (Document No. 82) are hereby stricken for failure to comply with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. Plaintiffs’ waiver of service filed with respect to Mills (Document No. 40) is hereby stricken as the form is incomplete. 3. Plaintiff shall serve Civetti, Jim Doe, John Doe, Hannah, Jenkins, Mayfield, Mills, and Ruscitti, and file valid proofs of service in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than April 19, 2022. The court is not inclined to grant any extensions of this deadline. 4. Failure to file valid proof(s) of service by the deadline set forth above will result in the defendant(s) being dismissed from the action without prejudice for failure to effect service, for lack of prosecution and/or failure to comply with the orders of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 & 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388(1962). 00 : 00 Initials of Preparer gga CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown