UDR Eight80 I LP v. Janet Chaney
UDR Eight80 I LP v. Janet Chaney
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-01320-CJC-ADS Document 7 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 1 PaJge ISD #:2-06
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 22-01320-CJC(ADSx) Date: July 20, 2022
Title: UDR EIGHT80 I LP V. JANET CHANEY
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT
Defendant seeks to remove this eviction proceeding to federal court, invoking this Court’s federal question jurisdiction. Defendant states no cognizable basis for federal question jurisdiction. Instead, she makes a vague statement that the determination of a demurrer she filed in state court involves federal law. But it is axiomatic that a federal defense or counter-claim does not give rise to federal-question jurisdiction. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. Laborers Vacation Trust for S. Cal.,
463 U.S. 1, 14(1983). The Court REMANDS this action to state court.
MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk RRP
Reference
- Status
- Unknown