United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2022

L.A. Hydro-Jet and Rooter Service, Inc. v. LA County Jetting Services, Inc.

L.A. Hydro-Jet and Rooter Service, Inc. v. LA County Jetting Services, Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided August 8, 2022
L.A. Hydro-Jet and Rooter Service, Inc. v. LA County Jetting Services, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-06324-FMO-JPR Document 35 Filed 08/08/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 21-6324-FMO (JPRx) Date August 8, 2022 Title L.A. Hydro-Jet and Rooter Service, Inc. v. LA County Jetting Services, Inc. et al Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Gabriela Garcia None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Order of January 24, 2022, the parties were required to complete a settlement conference before a private mediator no later than July 21, 2022. (See Dkt. 33, Court’s Order of January 24, 2022, at 17). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later than 48 hours after the settlement conference was complete. (See id.).

As of the filing date of this Order, neither a Notice of Settlement nor a Status Report Re: Settlement has been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, no later than August 15, 2022, the parties shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s Order of January 24, 2022. Failure to submit a response to this Order by the deadline set forth above may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962); Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 909 (2003).

00 : 00 Initials of Preparer gga CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.