Deondre Raglin v. Donald R. Swanson
Deondre Raglin v. Donald R. Swanson
Trial Court Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-01144-SPG-DFM Document 18 Filed 08/29/22 Pagelof1 Page ID #:83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 8:22-cv-01144-SPG-DFM Date August 29, 2022
Title Deondre Raglin v. Donald R. Swanson et al
Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 13, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant Donald R. Swanson as Trustee of the Swanson Family Trust did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer PG
CV 90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1
Reference
- Status
- Unknown