Case 2:22-cv-02377-SPG-PVC Document13 Filed 09/06/22 Pagel1of1 Page ID #:57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. = 2:22-cv-02377-SPG-PVC Date September 6, 2022

Title Cheef Holdings v. VAAD Holdings LLC et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 20, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant VAAD Holdings LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG

CV 90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1