Case 2:22-cv-03884-SPG-JEM Document 16 Filed 09/15/22 Pagelof2 Page ID#:85 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 2:22-cv-03884-SPG-JEM Date September 15, 2022 Title Sam Benford v. Sandy Feet, LLC et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 29, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s):

SANDY FEET, LLC

Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within

CV 90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk PG

Case 2:22-cv-03884-SPG-JEM Document 16 Filed 09/15/22 Page 2of2 Page 1ID#:86 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. = 2:22-cv-03884-SPG-JEM Date September 15, 2022 Title Sam Benford v. Sandy Feet, LLC et al the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG