Andre Luiz Costa Soares v. Green Dot Bank

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Andre Luiz Costa Soares v. Green Dot Bank

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04036-SPG-JPR Document 25 Filed 10/04/22 Pagelof1 Page ID #:272 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. = 2:22-cv-04036-SPG-JPR Date October 4, 2022 Title Andre Luiz Costa Soares v. Green Dot Bank

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). On August 11, 2022, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 22). On September 7, 2022, the Court issued a text-order setting Plaintiff's deadline to file an amended complaint for September 28,2022. (ECF No. 23). Plaintiffhas not filed an amended complaint to date. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before October 25, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff's response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG

CV 90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1

Reference

Status
Unknown