Carly Jeanne Olszewski v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Carly Jeanne Olszewski v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02767-SPG-AS Document 30 Filed 10/13/22 Pagelof1 Page ID #:92 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 2:22-cv-02767-SPG-AS Date October 13, 2022 Title Carly Jeanne Olszewski v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not applicable Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 28, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant Nicolas Carl Kendryna did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer PG

CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page | of 1

Reference

Status
Unknown