Ronnie Martinez v. United States
Ronnie Martinez v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-01496-FMO-JPR Document 16 Filed 11/07/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:37
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ) Case No. CV 22-1496 FMO (JPRx) ) 12 RONNIE MARTINEZ, ) ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER AND JUDGMENT DISMISSING 14 v. ) ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION ) 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 ) 18 Pursuant to the Court’s Order of August 8, 2022, (Dkt. 14), pro se plaintiff Ronnie Martinez 19 (“plaintiff”) was informed of her obligation to keep the court apprised of her current address 20 pursuant to Local Rule 41-6 (“Dismissal – Failure of Pro Se Plaintiff to Keep Court Apprised of 21 Current Address”) and to file a Notice of Change of Address no later than August 26, 2022. (See 22 Dkt. 14, Court’s Order of August 8, 2022). The court advised plaintiff that “failure to file a Notice 23 of Change of Address by the deadline set forth above shall result in the action being dismissed 24 for lack of prosecution and/or for failure to comply with a court order.” (Id.). 25 As of the filing date of this Order, no Notice of Change of Address has been filed. (See, 26 generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed, 27 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court, 28 Case 2:22-cv-01496-FMO-JPR Document 16 Filed 11/07/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:38
1 pursuant to Local Rule 41. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 2 629-30,
82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388(1962). 3 Dated this 7th day of November, 2022. 4 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown