Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02535-FMO-AS Document 25 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:149

JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ULMA MILAGRO SERRANO, ) Case No. CV 22-2535 FMO (ASx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 COSTCO WHOLESALE ) CORPORATION et al, ) 14 ) Defendant. ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 24, 17 Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 19 December 28, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains 20 full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 21 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall 22 be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.

23 P. 41

(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629-30

,

82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388

(1962). 24 Dated this 28th day of November, 2022. 25 /s/ 26 Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown