Korttney Elliott v. Torres South El Monte, LLC

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Korttney Elliott v. Torres South El Monte, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02502-SPG-GJS Document 31 Filed 12/06/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:118

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-02502-SPG(GJSx) Date December 6, 2022

Title Korttney Elliot v. Torres South El Monte et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before December 20, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant Torres South El Monte, LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:

Initials of Preparer pg

Page 1 of 1

Reference

Status
Unknown