United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2022

Warren v. City of Chico

Warren v. City of Chico
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 14, 2022
Warren v. City of Chico

Trial Court Opinion

1 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CORY TURNER, SBN # 285235 E-mail: [email protected] Normal Avenue Chico, CA 95928 Telephone: (530) 345-9491 Fax: (530) 345-6913 SARAH J. STEINHEIMER, SBN # 267552 E-mail: [email protected] STEPHEN E. GOLDBERG, SBN # 173499 E-mail: [email protected] 517 12th Street Sacramento, CA 95928 Telephone: (916) 551-2150 Fax: (916) 551-2195 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Additional counsel continued on next page Roger A. Colvin, Esq. (SBN 68773) Vincent C. Ewing, Esq. (SBN 177708) Eric G. Salbert, Esq. (SBN 276073) ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN Attorneys at Law 13181 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 400 City of Industry, CA 91746 Telephone (562) 699-5500 ꞏ Facsimile (562) 692-2244 [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

21 BOBBY WAR REN; A NDY LAMB ACH; Case No. 2:21-cv-00640- MCE-DMC JONATHON WILLIAMS; MICHAEL SAMUELSON; TRACY MILLER; TONA PETERSEN; CAROL BETH STIPULATED ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT, THOMPSON; CHRISTA STEVENS, DISMISSAL AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION 24 Plaintiffs, 25 v. Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. CITY OF CHICO; CITY OF CHICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

1 WESTERN CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY ALEXANDER PRIETO, SBN # 270864 Email: [email protected] ROBERT D. NEWMAN, SBN # 86534 Email: [email protected] RICHARD ROTHSCHILD, SBN # 67356 Email: [email protected] 3701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 208 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Telephone: (213) 487-7211 Fax: (213) 487-0242 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1 On April 8, 2021, Plaintiffs Bobby Warren, Andy Lambach, Jonathon Williams, Michael Samuelson, Tracy Miller, Tona Peterson, Carol Beth Thompson, and Christa Stevens (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed the above-captioned lawsuit against the City o f Chico and the City of Chico Police Department (collectively “Defendants”). ECF 1. On April 11, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint alleging that Defendants unlawfully enforced a citywide web of local laws that imposed criminal penalties on people experiencing unsheltered homelessness when they sleep, sit, lie down, and rest in public in violation of, among other things, the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and California civil rights laws. ECF 34. Defendants have denied all material allegations in the First Amended Complaint. ECF 86.

10 On April 11, 2021, this Court granted the Temporary Restraining Order restraining and enjoining Defendants from enforcing or threatening to enforce laws regulating camping, entering and remaining, and storing personal property on public property. ECF 37. On July 8, 2021, this Court entered a Preliminary Injunction against Defendants continuing the same terms previously set forth in the Temporary Restraining Order. ECF 110.

15 Following extensive discussions, the Parties subsequently reached a settlement resolving the disputed claims in this Action. A copy of the fully executed Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) is attached hereto as Exhibit A, the terms of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

19 The Court hereby expressly retains jurisdiction to resolve any future disputes regarding the interpretation, performance, or enforcement of the Settlement Agreement for a period of five (5) years from the date of dismissal. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994); Flanagan v. Arnaiz, 143 F.3d 540, 544 (9th Cir. 1998).

23 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and good cause appearing therefore, the Court HEREBY ORDERS AND DECREES the following: 25 1. The Court’s Preliminary Injunction dated July 8, 2021, is hereby dissolved in its entirety.

26 2. This Order expressly incorporates all of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, attached 27 as Exhibit A, into this Order, including and expressly, all nonmonetary terms set forth in 28 the Settlement Agreement.

1 3. The Court expressly retains exclusive jurisdiction for a period of five (5) years from the 2 date of entry of this Order to enforce the Settlement Agreement, and refers this matter to 3 Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman to resolve any future disputes pursuant to the 4 Dispute Resolution procedures in the Settlement Agreement regarding interpretation, 5 performance, or enforcement of the Settlement Agreement, including and expressly, 6 nonmonetary terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Specifically, exclusive 7 jurisdiction shall be with the District Court and all future decisions will be made by 8 Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.

9 4. Except as provided otherwise in the Settlement Agreement, each side shall bear their own 10 fees and costs in this Action.

11 5. This entire Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants.

12 IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 | Dated: January 14, 2022 15 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, J UNITED STATES DISTRI APPROVED AS TO FORM | Dated: January 13, 2022 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 21 By: /s/Sarah J. Stemheimer Sarah J. Sternheimer 22 Attorneys for Plaintiffs | Dated: January 12, 2022 WESTERN CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY 27 By: /s/Robert D. Newman __ Robert D. Newman 28 Attomeys for Plaintiffs Dated: January 13, 2022 ALVAREZ-GLASMAN & COLVIN

3 By: /s/Vincent C. Ewing__ __ Vincent C. Ewing 4 Attorneys for Defendants All parties have authorized the use of their electronic signatures for this document.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.