Gemini Insurance Company v. HDI Global Specialty SE

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Gemini Insurance Company v. HDI Global Specialty SE

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00172-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 13 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 14 HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 16) 16 17 On March 7, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice as to 18 Defendant HDI Global Specialty SE, and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF 19 No. 16.) The stipulation specifies that dismissal against the Doe Defendants is without 20 prejudice. (Id.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. 21 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997), and has 22 been dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant HDI Global Specialty SE, without prejudice as to 23 any Doe Defendants, and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / / / / 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 2 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 | Dated: _ March 7, 2022

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown