(PC)Allen v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY LEE ALLEN No. 2:21-cv-00870 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, 16 Defendant.

18 By order filed November 08, 2021, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Plaintiff has consented to this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302.

23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case.

25 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections || with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 || (9th Cir. 1991).

6 | Dated: March 7, 2022 / hice ANKE) flo CAROLYNK.DELANEY 4 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 14 12/alle0870.fta