Goldberg v. Nadhan, Inc.
Goldberg v. Nadhan, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN 94582) [email protected] 2 DAYNA F. OLSON (SBN: 327577) [email protected] 3 J SUPPLE LAW A Professional Corporation 4 990 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 5 Telephone: (415) 366-5533 Facsimile: (415) 480-6301 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 NADHAN, INC., dba ORCHARD POST ACUTE CARE (erroneously sued and sued and served as Nadhan, Inc.); SUZETTE CHEATHAM; and MELVIN RIMANDO 8
9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11
12 RONALD GOLDBERG by and through his Case No. 2:22-cv-00239-TLN-KJN Successor in Interest, SANDRA GOLDBERG; 13 SANDRA GOLDBERG, RHONDA WASERMAN, Removal from Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS 057376] ANNETTE MCGAHAN, WILLIAM BECKER, and 14 DANIEL BECKER, individually ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO 15 SUPERIOR COURT AND VACATE Plaintiff, HEARING 16 vs. Complaint Filed: November 3, 2021 17 Removed: February 3, 2022 NADHAN, INC., NADHAN, INC. dba ORCHARD 18 POST ACUTE CARE, SUZETTE CHEATHAM, Assigned to Hon. Troy L. Nunley, MELVIN RIMANDO and DOES 1-100, Courtroom 2, 15th Floor 19 Defendants. 20
21 Defendants,
22 and
23 JASON GOLDBERG,
24 Nominal Defendant
25
26
27 28 Defense counsel and Plaintiffs counsel met and conferred regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, and the recent 9th Circuit ruling in Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare (2022) -F.4th--,
2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 4631. Counsel for both parties agreed and stipulated to the following: 1. The instant action shall be remanded to the Solano County Superior Court (Case No. FCS 057376). 2. The April 7, 2022, hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby vacated. 9 IT ISSO ORDERED. r> /) Ayal Hol \ | WA 11 || Dated: March 17, 2022 Vows 12 Troy L. Nunley . = United States District Judge (123 4
15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown