United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2022

(PC) Rodriguez v. Knight

(PC) Rodriguez v. Knight
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided April 12, 2022
(PC) Rodriguez v. Knight

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELADIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:19-cv-2552 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER G. KNIGHT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force against him, failed to protect him, and conspired to violate his rights during the disciplinary hearing process.

20 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 59.)

21 In support of his motion to appoint counsel plaintiff argues that the court should appoint counsel because defendants argued against production of video evidence based on plaintiff’s status as an inmate proceeding without counsel. (ECF No. 50 at 3.)

24 Defendants filed an opposition and motion to strike. (ECF No. 60.) Defendants state the motion is unsigned and therefore invalid under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and Local Rule 131(c). (Id. at 1.) Additionally, they allege that the motion was not mailed by plaintiff. (Id. at 2.)

27 As defendants argue, the motion is not signed and it appears it was sent by Juanita Machado from an address in Hawthorne, California. (See ECF No. 59 at 6, 31.) The court cannot || consider unsigned filings and plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel will be stricken from the || record for that reason. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; E.D. Cal. R. 131(b). Plaintiffmay refile a signed copy | of themotion. Additionally, plaintiffis advised that while individuals may appear in propria | persona on their own behalf, they may not represent the interest of others. C.E. Pope Equity Trust | v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (citations omitted). All future filings should | be submitted by plaintiff, or an attorney authorized to represent him in this action.

7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (ECF || No. 59) is stricken because it is unsigned.

9 | Dated: April 12, 2022 12 BORAH BARNES 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE | ps2 DB/DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/rodr2552.mta

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.