(PC) Mustill v. Sacramento County Main Jail

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SEAN E. MUSTILL, No. 2:21-cv-1720 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS et al., Defendants.

18 By order filed March 4, 2022, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4 | Dated: April 14, 2022 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9} 1 10 must! 720.fta 1]