(HC) Kabede v. CA Governors Parole Board Hearing Dept.
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WONDIYRAD KABEDE, 11 Case No. 21-05366 EJD (PR) Petitioner, 12 ORDER OF TRANSFER v. CA GOVERNOR’S PAROLE BOARD HEARING DEP’T, et al., Respondents.
18 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the denial of parole on January 9, 2020. Dkt.
20 No. 15 at 4, 25. On November 9, 2021, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend, specifically with regards to the exhaustion of state judicial remedies. Dkt. No. 14.
22 Petitioner filed an amended petition. Dkt. No. 15.
23 Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction or sentencing. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 31 F.Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F.Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). But if the || parole or time credits claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. See || Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).
3 Here, Petitioner is challenging the denial of parole. See supra at 1. Petitioner is || currently confined at the California Health Care Facility in San Joaquin County. Dkt. 15 at || 1. San Joaquin County lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 || U.S.C. § 84(b). Therefore, venue properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 || U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District g || Court for the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
9 The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the || Eastern District of California.
11 IT ISSO ORDERED. q (12 || Dated: _ April 72002 au 1 EDWARD J. DAVILA 3 United States District Judge z 15
2 18
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.