Buttner v. Ninos
Buttner v. Ninos
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | CHRISTOPHER BUTTNER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00244-JLT-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 12 | MICHAEL NINOS, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 10) 14 15 On April 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 10.) In light o 16 | Plaintiff's notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) 17 | Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed withou 18 | prejudice. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjus 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 43 | Dated: April 25, 2022 : UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown