Gilbert v. Tang
Gilbert v. Tang
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 12 | CHHIENG TANG, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 15) 14 15 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 15.) In light 16 | of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson 17 | v.City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. 18 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 19 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 99 | Dated: _May 11, 2022 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown