United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2022

(HC) Paisano v. De La Cruz

(HC) Paisano v. De La Cruz
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 16, 2022
(HC) Paisano v. De La Cruz

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORMA PAISANO, No. 2:22-cv-0641 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER MICHAEL PALLARES, 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a California prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

19 Petitioner has filed a motion asking that this matter be stayed pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) so that petitioner can exhaust state court remedies as to claims 4 and 5 in her petition. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition within 14 days. In the amended petition, petitioner shall omit claims 4 and 5 appearing in the original petition.

25 ///// ///// ///// ///// 1 2. Petitioner’s motion for a stay (ECF No. 3) is granted.! Upon filing of the amended || petition, this matter will be stayed until petitioner exhausts state court remedies with respect to || claims 4 and 5.

4 | Dated: May 16, 2022 aa | / a /y i 5 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE || paiso64at.sty 1] | By granting petitioner’s motion for a stay, the court makes no representation as to whether any || of the claims in petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus were filed within the applicable limitations period or whether the claims which are dismissed will be deemed timely when | reinstated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.