(PC) Ramos v. Rocha

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL AJURIA RAMOS, No. 2:19-cv-0726 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS I. ROCHA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed March 22, 2022, plaintiff was granted sixty days to file a pretrial statement.

18 Plaintiff has not filed a pretrial statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110.

21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement.

23 2. The pretrial conference set for August 1, 2022, is vacated; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110.

26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the || objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6 || Dated: May 25, 2022 Foci) Aharon 8 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE || 4am00726.fp12 1]