Estate of Xander Mann v. County of Stanislaus
Trial Court Opinion
1 Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849) RIVERA HEWITT PAUL LLP Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 289805) 11341 Gold Express Drive, Ste. 160 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN Gold River, California 95670 1010 F Street, Suite 300 Tel: 916-922-1200 Sacramento, California 95814 Fax: 916-922-1303 Telephone: (916) 443-6911 Shanan L. Hewitt (SBN 200168) Facsimile: (916) 447-8336 [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Jill B. Nathan (SBN 186136) 6 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Attorneys for Defendants, ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, AMY PICKERING, and JUSTIN MANN STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S And for Cross-Defendant DEPARTMENT, and JEFF DIRKSE ESTATE OF XANDER MANN DONALD W. COOK, CSB 116666 PORTER SCOTT ATTORNEY AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2910 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 Los Angeles, CA 90010 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 (213) 252-9444 / (213) 252-0091 facsimile Sacramento, California 95825 E-mail: [email protected] TEL: 916.929.1481 Attorney for Plaintiff, FAX: 916.927.3706 HECTOR del ALTO, by guardian ad Attorneys for Defendant, litem ADRIANNA SALGADO GERARDO ZAZUETA 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, AMY ) CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO PICKERING, and JUSTIN MANN, ) ) JOINT STIPULATION TO 22 Plaintiff, ) CONSOLIDATE CASES; ORDER v. ) CONSOLIDATING CASES 23 ) COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ) (Doc. 53) STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S ) DEPARTMENT, JEFF DIRKSE, ) GERARDO ZAZUETA, ) and DOE 1 to 20, ) 27 ) Defendants. ) 28 ) HECTOR del ALTO, by guardian ad ) CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB litem ADRIANNA SALGADO, ) 2 ) 3 Plaintiff, ) v. ) 4 ) COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, a local ) government entity; STANISLAUS ) COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, ) a local government entity; GERARDO ) ZAZUETA, an individual sued in his ) individual capacity; ESTATE OF ) XANDER MANN; and DOES 1-10, all ) individuals in both their individual and ) official capacities, ) 10 ) Defendants. ) ) 13 TO THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 15 The parties, ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, AMY PICKERING, and JUSTIN MANN, Plaintiffs in the matter of Estate of Xander Mann, et al., v. County of Stanislaus, et al. Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO, and HECTOR del ALTO, by guardian ad litem ADRIANNA SALGADO, Plaintiff in the matter of Hector del Alto v. County of Stanislaus, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB; and Defendants including COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, JEFF DIRKSE, and GERARDO ZAZUETA, by and through their respective counsel of record, collectively known as the “Parties,” have conferred and hereby stipulate to consolidate cases Estate of Xander Mann, et al., v. County of Stanislaus, et al. and Hector del Alto v. County of Stanislaus, et al., pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
25 JOINT STIPULATION 26 WHEREAS, presently pending in this Court are two related actions identified below: 27 1. Estate of Xander Mann, e al., v. County of Stanislaus, et al. United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO (“Mann”); and 1 2. Hector del Alto, by guardian ad litem Adrianna Salgado v. County of Stanislaus, et al., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:22-CV-00384-DAD-SAB (“del Alto”); 4 WHEREAS, both cases arise out of the same officer involved shooting which occurred on May 18, 2021; 6 WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, Decedent’s mother AMY PICKERING and Decedent’s father JUSTIN MANN filed their Complaint for Damages for Violation of Civil and Constitutional Rights against Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and GERARDO ZAZUETA alleging constitutional claims and torts claims on their own behalf as well as constitutional, state law and survivorship claims on behalf of Xander Mann (“Decedent”) as his mother and father. Plaintiffs also allege they have the right to recover as co-successors in interest to Decedent; 13 WHEREAS, on March 31, 2022, HECTOR del ALTO, by guardian ad litem ADRIANNA SALGADO filed his complaint for damages, alleging constitutional claims and tort claims on his own behalf against the COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, GERARDO ZAZUETA and the ESTATE OF XANDER MANN; 17 WHEREAS, Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to consolidate actions pending before it if those actions involve a “common question of law or fact.”
19 “The threshold issue is whether the two proceedings involve a common party and common issues of fact or law.” Seguro de Servicio de Salud v. McAuto Sys. Group, 878 F.2d 5, 8 (1st Cir. 1989).
21 The single essential requirement is questions of law or fact common to the cases to be consolidated.
22 Enterprise Bank v. Saettele, 21 F.3d 233, 235 (8th Cir. 1994).
23 WHEREAS the Parties now seek to consolidate the above related actions pursuant to F.R.C.P. 42 because each action asserts substantially the same claims and raise substantially the same questions of fact and law regarding liability and damages; 26 WHEREAS, the instant actions of Mann and Salgado (del Alto) have both been properly filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California and involve the same facts and circumstances, share many of the same causes of action, would require the same legal analysis, and as such, satisfy the only requirement for consolidation under Rule 42(a); 2 WHEREAS, consolidating these two cases would clearly serve the interests of justice: increases judicial efficiency, avoids duplicative evidence, procedures, and inconsistent adjudications, precludes waste, and alleviates potential burdens to the court and to all parties involved.
6 STIPULATION 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record: 9 1. The Eastern District cases Estate of Xander Mann, et al., v. County of Stanislaus, et al.
10 Case No. 1:21-cv-01098, and Salgado (del Alto) v. County of Stanislaus, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv- 00384 will be consolidated.
12 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14 Dated: July 6, 2022 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN /s/ Mark E. Merin 16 (as authorized on 7/6/22) _____________________________ 17 MARK E. MERIN PAUL H. MASUHARA Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 ESTATE OF XANDER MANN, AMY PICKERING, and JUSTIN MANN Dated: July 8, 2022 RIVERA HEWITT PAUL LLP _/s/ Jill B. Nathan________________ 24 SHANAN L. HEWITT JILL B. NATHAN 25 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF’S 27 DEPARTMENT, and JEFF DIRKSE Dated: June 29, 2022 LAW OFFICE OF DONALD W. COOK /s/ Donald W. Cook 3 (original signature retained by attorney) _ ____________________ DONALD W. COOK 5 Attorney for Plaintiff HECTOR del ALTO, by guardian ad litem 6 ADRIANNA SALGADO
8 Dated: July 7, 2022 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 10 /s/ John R. Whitefleet (as authorized on 7/7/22) 11 _______________________________ JOHN R. WHITEFLEET Attorneys for Defendant 13 GERARDO ZAZUETA 1 ORDER 2 In view of the foregoing stipulation of the parties (Doc. 53), and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 3 P. 42(a), it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Clerk of Court shall consolidate Estate of Xander Mann, et al., v. County of Stanislaus, et al. Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO with Salgado (del Alto) v. County of Stanislaus, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB for all purposes; 7 2. All future filings and correspondence shall use Case No. 1:21-cv-01098-AWI- SKO; 9 3. The Clerk shall move Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7–11 from the docket of 1:22- cv-00384-DAD-SAB to the docket of 1:21-cv-01098-AWI-SKO; 11 4. The Clerk shall administratively close Salgado (del Alto) v. County of Stanislaus, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB1; and 13 5. The Clerk shall file a copy of this order in Case No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 13, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.