United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2022

(SS) Corchado v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Corchado v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided July 14, 2022
(SS) Corchado v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.

2 CA Bar ID No.: 278044 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 2440 Tulare St., Ste. 320 Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: 559-439-9700 Facsimile: 559-439-9723 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff, Clarisa Corchado 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRESNO DIVISION CLARISA CORCHADO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00213-EPG Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND 12 PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND v. EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL 13 ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 28) Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND ONE-HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS and 89/100 ($6,199.89) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and cost in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. §1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 22 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

3 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña.

7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

12 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

15 Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 13, 2022 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña J ONATHAN O. PEÑA 18 Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: July 13, 2022 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 21 LISA A. THOMAS Regional Chief Counsel, Region VII 22 Social Security Administration 23 By: _*_Sarah E. Preston Sarah E. Preston Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 25 Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature 26 obtained via email on July 13, 2022).

1 ORDER 2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act || Fees and Expenses (ECF No. 28), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of SIX || THOUSAND ONE-HUNDRED NINETY-NINE DOLLARS and 89/100 ($6,199.89) as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the ° Stipulation.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

101 Dated: _ July 13, 2022 [Je ey 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -3-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.