United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2022

(HC)Ramirez v. The People of the State of California

(HC)Ramirez v. The People of the State of California
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided July 21, 2022
(HC)Ramirez v. The People of the State of California

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ISAIAH B. RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00604-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER CONSTRUING PETITION AS MOTION TO AMEND PETITION IN CASE 13 v. NO. 1:22-cv-00295-HBK PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CALIFORNIA, RE-FILE INSTANT PETITION AS MOTION 15 TO AMEND IN CASE NO. 1:22-cv-00295- Respondent. HBK ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 17 CLOSE THIS CASE 19 Petitioner Isaiah B. Ramirez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this instant petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on May 10, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). The Court takes judicial notice of its own files which reveal that Petitioner has a previously filed federal petition in this Court challenging the same conviction at case number 1:22-cv-00295-HBK. Thus, the Court construes the filing as a motion to amend the petition filed in Petitioner’s earlier case and orders this matter closed.

25 In Woods v. Carey, the Ninth Circuit held that, under certain circumstances, if a pro se petitioner files a habeas petition during the pendency of a previous petition, the district court should construe the second petition as a motion to amend the previous petition. 525 F.3d 886, 889-90 (9th Cir. 2008). Hence, Woods appears to require a district court to construe a “second or | successive” petition filed while an earlier petition is still pending in the district court as a motion | to amend the earlier petition.

3 Because Petitioner has a pending federal habeas petition in case number 1:22-cv-00295- | HBK, which challenges the same conviction as in this case, the Court must construe this Petition | as amotion to amend the earlier-filed petition. See id. at 889-90.

6 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 7 1. The Court construes the Petition (Doc. No. 1) as a motion to amend the Petition in 8 case number 1:22-cv-00295-HBK.

9 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket the Petition in this case as a motion to 10 amend in case number 1:22-cv-00295-HBK.

11 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 'S | Dated: _ July 20, 2022 law Nh. fareh Base □□□ 14 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.