Kakar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Kakar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 HOUSI KAKAR, Case No. 2:22−CV−00561−TLN−CKD 13 Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION TO SUBMIT ACTION TO BINDING ARBITRATION 14 v. AND DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 15 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 through 50, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ] Pending before the Court is a Stipulation to Submit Action to Binding Arbitration and to 2 || Dismiss Without Prejudice (ECF no. 9). The stipulation is approved. The parties have stipulated 3 || that this entire action be submitted to binding arbitration. Accordingly, no claims remain pending 4 || for decision by this Court. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Johnmohammadi v. 5 || Bloomingdale’s, Inc.,
755 F.3d 1072, 1074(9th Cir. 2014). This Order does not preclude either 6 || party from returning to court to confirm, vacate, or modify the arbitration award as provided in 9 7||U.S.C. § 1 et seq. ry /) 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. “ \ / of WA 9||DATED: August 11, 2022 ae" ZA S Troy L. Nunley> } 10 United States District Judge 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown