(HC) Phan v. Covello

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MINH KHA HOANG PHAN, No. 2:21-cv-02219-TLN-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER P. CAVELLO, 15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, is proceeding with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On August 4, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 20.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 4, 2022 (ECF No. 20), are ADOPTED in full; and 4 2. Petitioner’s Motion for “Summary Judgement” (ECF No. 14), which is essentially a motion for entry of default judgment, is DENIED.

6 DATED: September 21, 2022