Marez v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9} ARTHUR MAREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-01063-JLT-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF 11] v. ONLY DEFENDANTS ROBERT BELTRAN AND ANDREW ZARAGOSA PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC | COMPANY, et al., (ECF No. 10) 14 Defendants.
16 . . .
On October 17, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice as to only Defendants Robert Beltran and Andrew Zaragosa, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs. (ECF No. 10). In light of the parties’ stipulation, the case against only Defendants Robert Beltran and Andrew Zaragosa has ended and is dismissed without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own fees and costs. See Fed. R. Civ. P. □□ (a). )(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of | san Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
22 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to designate on the docket that | Robert Beltran and Andrew Zaragosa have been terminated as defendants in this case.
IS SO ORDERED.
25} Dated: _ October 18, 2022 [spe ey — 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.