(SS) Salas v. Commissioner of Social Security

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNTHIA SALAS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00289-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND 13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING REMANDING CASE1 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. No. 16) 16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 13) 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed November 10, 2022.

20 (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff Cynthia Salas and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for payment of benefits as of the alleged onset date, August 8, 2018, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.).

23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision.

25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10).

1 | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The | Melkonyan court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remand — || sentence four or sentence six. /d. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without || resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted).

6 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, the case is remanded for payment | of benefits as of the alleged onset date, August 8, 2018.

9 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 10 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to | remand (Doc. No. 16) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is REMANDED | tothe Commissioner of Social Security for payment of benefits as of the alleged onset date, | August 8, 2018.

14 2. An application for attorney fees may be filed by separate motion.

15 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) is MOOT.

16 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close | this case. '? | Dated: _ November 22, 2022 Mile. Wh fareh Zaskth 20 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE