Cordero v. J.C. Penney Corp., Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Irma G. Cordero, No. 2:19-cv-00653-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv.
14 J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants.
17 The parties have not complied with this court’s previous order to submit periodic joint | status reports while the action is stayed. See Stay Order, ECF No. 16; Order to Show Cause, ECF | No. 19, discharged, ECF No. 21. In late July of this year, they gave notice of an informal | settlement agreement, but since then, nothing more has been filed. Plaintiff is ordered to show | cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with | court orders. See Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Lichtenegger, 913 F.3d 884, 890 (9th Cir. 2019) | (listing relevant considerations).
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 DATED: November 28, 2022.
26 wit CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.