Volle v. Kopelev

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Volle v. Kopelev

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DEBRA VOLLE, Case No.21-cv-00665-NC

Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 30 LEON KOPELEV, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 |} Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 381

(1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: January 10, 2022 hb-e<——— —_—> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown