Johnson v. Doe
Johnson v. Doe
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARRELL EUGENE JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-00264-JD 8 Plaintiff, 9 y. ORDER RE DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5 10 DOE, ul Defendant. 12
13 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, filed a pro se civil rights action. Court records indicate that 14 || plaintiff already proceeds with a case in this Court concerning the same defendant and claims. See 3 15 || Johnson vy. Doe, Case No. 21-cv-9385 JD. This case is dismissed as duplicative. See Adams vy. a 16 Cal. Dept. of Health Services,
487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court will screen the earlier 3 17 || filed complaint. Plaintiff also filed another earlier complaint with the same defendants and claims 18 that was also dismissed as duplicative. See Johnson v. Doe, Case No. 21-9971 JD. 19 For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED as duplicative and as frivolous in light 20 || of the multiple complaints with the exact same allegations. The pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 2, 5) 21 are VACATED. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 7, 2022 24 25 JAMES ATO 26 United St@tes District Judge 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown