Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co.
Taad v. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JASON TAAD, Case No. 22-cv-00350-JST
Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 Re: ECF No. 17 10 BIGGE CRANE AND RIGGING CO., Defendant. 11
12 13 On February 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this case to state court. ECF No. 14 17. Defendant’s opposition was due March 2, 2022. Id. The deadline has passed, and no 15 opposition has been filed. If Defendant does not oppose the motion, it was required to “file with 16 the Court a Statement of Non-Opposition within the time for filing and serving any opposition.” 17 Civ. L.R. 7-3(b). 18 Defendant is ordered to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition by March 22, 19 2022. Defendant is also ordered to show cause in writing by March 22, 2022 why sanctions 20 should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court’s local rules. See Civ. L.R. 1-4; Oliva 21 v. Sullivan,
958 F.2d 272, 273(9th Cir. 1992) (“District courts have inherent power to control their 22 dockets and may impose sanctions, including dismissal, in the exercise of that discretion.”) 23 (citation omitted). The Court will conduct a hearing on the order to show cause on April 12, 2022 24 at 2:00 p.m. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 1 Plaintiffs reply on the motion to remand is due March 31, 2022. The hearing on the 2 || motion to remand is continued to April 28, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 Dated: March 8, 2022 5 JON S. TIGAR 6 ited States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12
13
© 15 16
= 17
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown