Gomez v. Buresh

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Gomez v. Buresh

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 21-cv-08138-KAW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH ? v. PREJUDICE 10 DONALD FRANK BURESH, Re: Dkt. No. 19 11 Defendant.

13 On March 23, 2022, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. 14 || (Dismissal Order, Dkt. No. 18.) The Court gave Plaintiff 21 days to file an amended complaint or 3 15 a notice of intent not to file an amended complaint. (Ud. at 6.) On April 13, 2022, Plaintiff 16 || notified the Court that he would not file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 19.) Accordingly, the 3 17 |} Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 12(b)(6) and will enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close the case. See Edwards v. Marin 19 || Park, Inc.,

356 F.3d 1058, 1064-65

(9th Cir. 2004). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 || Dated: April 27, 2022 .

23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown