1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SIA FRASER, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04600-JSW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO 9 V. SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING CASE 10 TEAM HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.,, et al., 11 Defendants. L E 13 The Court has received Plaintiffs’ response to the Order to Show Cause dated April 28, 14 || 2022. Plaintiffs have informed the Court of their decision not to file an amended complaint. The 3 15 || Court finds good cause to discharge the order to show cause without imposing the sanction of 16 || Rule 41(b) dismissal. See Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 2004) i 17 || (noting that dismissal under Rule 41(b) is a sanction to be imposed only in “extreme Z 18 || circumstances.”). 19 Tn light of Plaintiffs’ choice not to amend the complaint, the Court HEREBY DISMISSES 20 || the case for the reasons stated in the Court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (See 21 Dkt. No. 72.) A separate judgment will issue, and the Clerk shall close the file. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 || Dated: May 16, 2022 / | j □□□ ; 24 \Lf Llu) ¢ JEFFREY 9, WHI 25 United Stalls DistYct Judge 26

27 28