1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CYNTHIA FARR, Case No. 21-cv-08099-JSW 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SECOND 10 V. MOTION TO DISMISS ll PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO., Re: Dkt. No. 20

W Defendant.

4 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on

15. || December 22, 2021. (Dkt. No. 7.) On April 21, 2022, this Court granted Defendant’s motion in A 16 || its entirety and as to all causes of action, granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by

17 || no later than May 27, 2022. (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff has not filed or attempted to file an amended

18 complaint. Therefore, Defendants’ second motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) is GRANTED and the 19 case is dismissed with prejudice. See Yourish v. California Amplifier,

(9th 20 Cir. 1999) (affirming the dismissal of a plaintiffs claims, with prejudice, after plaintiff failed to 21 09 file amended complaint within required timeframe); Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). 23 A separate judgment shall issue and the Clerk is instructed to close this case. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. □ } 25 ( | of Dated: July 6, 2022 i thu Ie 26 NK if |e f 7—FH ] 27 i YARN. S. WHITE | Unitéd States District Judge 28