Belleci v. Mroczek

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Belleci v. Mroczek

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARISA ANN BELLECI, 10 Case No. 21-cv-09630-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 DISMISS RICK MROCZEK, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 16 Appearing in pro se, plaintiff Marisa Ann Belleci filed this action alleging a wrongful 17 foreclosure of her residential property. With the complaint, Belleci sought a temporary restraining 18 order, which was denied for multiple reasons. The order observed the complaint invokes a 19 hodgepodge of frivolous theories that have repeatedly been found meritless in cases alleging 20 wrongful foreclosure, and that Belleci appeared to have stated no viable claim. Belleci thereafter 21 attempted to remove one or more cases pending against her in state court to be part of this action. 22 That attempt was rejected as improper, and the documents were stricken. 23 Defendants properly noticed and e-filed a motion to dismiss. Because Belleci is a 24 registered e-filer, she was automatically given notice through her email address of record. Belleci, 25 however, filed no response to the motion. Belleci appears to have abandoned this action, as she 26 also has not provided the court with an updated physical address. 27 In any event, the motion to dismiss must be granted. Although the complaint invokes 1 and violations of several statutory provisions, the allegations are wholly conclusory and based on 2 || legal theories that have been repeatedly rejected in cases challenging non-judicial foreclosures. 3 See generally, Vasquez v. U.S. Bank, N.A.,

2015 WL 5158538

, at *3-6 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2015) 4 (collecting cases). 5 The complaint is therefore dismissed. In view of Belleci’s status as a pro se litigant, she 6 || will be given the opportunity to amend, in the event she has a good faith basis to do so, and 7 intends to pursue this matter in this forum. Any amended complaint must be filed by July 29, 8 2022. In the event Belleci does not file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to this order, a 9 final dismissal will be entered without further notice and the case will be closed. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12

13 || Dated: July 7, 2022 =

RICHARD SEEBORG IS Chief United States District Judge 16

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE No. 21-cv-09630-RS

Reference

Status
Unknown