United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2022

Garcia v. Quong Fook Tong

Garcia v. Quong Fook Tong
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided July 15, 2022
Garcia v. Quong Fook Tong

Trial Court Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORLANDO GARCIA, 7 Case No. 21-cv-05539-JCS Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE QUONG FOOK TONG, Defendant.

13 Plaintiff in this case asserted claims under California’s Unruh Act and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) based on accessibility violations in connections with a business located at 751 Clay Street, San Francisco CA, called Tarta’s Secret. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claim, leaving only the ADA claim.

17 Although Plaintiff contends the business was open when he visited it in June 2021, the pictures he produced in his initial disclosures reflect that on July 26, 2021 – the date his investigator visited the business, see Whang Decl., Ex. A (dkt. no. 16-3) – the business was boarded up and closed.

20 Because the only remedy available to Plaintiff under Title III of the ADA is injunctive relief, the permanent closure of Tarta’s Secret would render prospective relief moot and deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Rivera v. Crema Coffee Co. LLC, 438 F. Supp. 3d 1068, 1073–74 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12188; Kohler v. Southland Foods, Inc., 459 F.

24 App'x 617, 618 (9th Cir. 2011); Wander v. Kaus, 304 F.3d 856, 858 (9th Cir. 2002) (“Damages are not recoverable under Title III of the ADA—only injunctive relief is available for violations of Title III.”); Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc., 861 F.3d 853, 864 (9th Cir. 2017) (“A request for injunctive relief remains live only so long as there is some present harm left to enjoin.”) (quoting omitted)). Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be || dismissed on the basis that the business that is the subject of Plaintiff’s claim is permanently || closed. Plaintiff shall file a response, including evidence that Tarta’s Secret continues to operate as a business, no later than July 22, 2022.

5 IT ISSO ORDERED.

6 || Dated: July 15, 2022 , J PH C. SPERO 8 ief Magistrate Judge

© & = 17 Z 18

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.