Kirkwood v. Sapporo Steak & Sushi House, Inc.
Kirkwood v. Sapporo Steak & Sushi House, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KAILEY KIRK WOOD, Case No.22-cv-00340-NC
Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 20 14 SAPPORO STEAK & SUSHI HOUSE, INC., Defendant. 15
16 17 The Court having entered the Consent Decree, Dkt. 20, and it appearing that no
18 || issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action 19 || and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is 20 || directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, 21 || provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED. 22 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 23 || Life Ins. Co. of Am.,
511 U.S. 375, 381(1994). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 || Dated: July 20, 2022 hKeo——_ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 27 United States Magistrate Judge 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown