1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 DNA SPORTS PERFORMANCE LAB, INC., et al., 11 No. C 20-00546 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 ORDER DENYING MOTION RE 4 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, et al., SEALING Defendants. 15 16

= 17 A prior order told the League and Union to lodge conditionally under seal plaintiff's Z 18 accounting of funds (Dkt. No. 144). The league duly filed a motion to consider whether 19 another party’s material should be sealed (Dkt. No. 146). Our Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3) 20 gives the designating party seven days to file a declaration in support of sealing. Two weeks 21 have now passed, and plaintiff has still not filed a supporting declaration. Accordingly, with 22 no factual support justifying sealing of the material, see Kamakana v. City and Cty. of 23 Honolulu,

, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006), the motion is DENIED and the material will be 24 placed on the public docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: September 9, 2022. ee 27 Al _ LIAM ALSUP 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE